Suhana Khan Land Deal: Why Shah Rukh Khan’s Daughter Faces Questions Over Raigad Farm Plot Purchase

Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan’s daughter, Suhana Khan, has recently found herself at the center of a controversy over the purchase of an agricultural land parcel in Maharashtra’s Raigad district. The transaction, valued at ₹12.91 crore, was completed on May 30, 2023, in the village of Thal near Alibaug. Nearly two years later, questions are being raised about whether due legal procedures were followed in acquiring the property.

At the heart of the dispute is the fact that the property Suhana bought is classified as agricultural land. Under Indian law, especially in states like Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Gujarat, only registered farmers are allowed to buy farmland. The rules are designed to prevent agricultural land from being diverted for non-farming purposes and to ensure it remains available for cultivation.

In Suhana’s case, documents submitted during the transaction reportedly listed her as a “farmer.” This detail has triggered an official inquiry into how the land deal was approved and whether the procedures were carried out in compliance with state laws.

The matter is currently under investigation, with the Alibaug Tehsildar tasked with examining the documents and purchase process. According to officials, agricultural land transactions must follow a strict process:

• The buyer must hold a farmer certificate issued by the revenue department.
• If the buyer does not already possess one, it must be obtained through proper application and verification.
• Any deviation from these rules can render the deal invalid.

Reports suggest that the Raigad land in question was originally allotted for agricultural purposes by the government, which makes the scrutiny even more stringent.

One of the most debated aspects of this case is the claim that Suhana Khan was described as a farmer in the purchase documents. This categorization is being closely reviewed, as it raises questions about how the certificate was obtained and whether it was in line with the law.

According to some reports, Suhana bought the land from three sisters — Anjali, Rekha, and Priya — who had inherited it from their parents. The land has since been transferred to Déjà Vu Farm Pvt Ltd, a company linked to Shah Rukh Khan’s wife Gauri Khan’s mother and sister. Suhana is also reported to have paid ₹77.46 lakh in stamp duty during the transaction.

Interestingly, rules for agricultural land ownership vary across India. While in Tamil Nadu there are no specific restrictions, states like Maharashtra have strict criteria. Without following due process, even a high-value land deal can be canceled. The underlying purpose is to protect farmland from being converted into residential or commercial use.

The police’s Resident Deputy Collector has ordered a deeper probe into the land deal. Until the investigation is completed, it remains unclear whether the purchase adhered to legal requirements. If violations are found, authorities could take corrective action, which might include cancellation of the transaction.

So far, neither Suhana Khan nor Shah Rukh Khan has made a public statement regarding the controversy. Legal experts believe the outcome will hinge on whether Suhana’s status as a “farmer” can be legitimately proven and whether all state regulations were followed during the transfer.

The case highlights a recurring issue in India’s property market — the complexities surrounding agricultural land ownership. With farmland often seen as a valuable investment near urban areas, wealthy individuals frequently attempt to acquire it, sometimes stretching or bypassing rules. This has led to increasing scrutiny by state authorities.

For Suhana Khan, who made her acting debut recently and has been in the limelight as a star kid, the controversy has drawn significant media attention. Whether this matter is resolved smoothly or escalates further will depend on the findings of the ongoing inquiry.

Bottom Line: Suhana Khan’s Raigad land deal has sparked a legal and public debate. While the transaction was completed two years ago, questions over her eligibility to buy farmland are now under official review. The final verdict will emerge only once the investigation report is made public.