Hearing the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, the Supreme Court has made important remarks on Hindu marriage and rights on property. Justice B.V. Nagratna said that it should be remembered how Hindu society is controlled. We do not want our decision to break any tradition that has been going on for thousands of years. Referring to the word “Kanyadaan”, he said that it is not just a ritual, but also the donation of the marriage dynasty. Nyayayamurthy Nagratna further said that after the marriage of a woman, her gatru and surname changes. This comment emphasizes that the tradition and social customs of Hindu marriage have been going on for centuries. This comment underlines the importance of maintaining social and cultural traditions of Hindu society. At a time when there is a debate on the rights of women in law and society. Nagratna said that if a woman is married, her husband and her family are responsible for her responsibility. A married woman cannot file a petition for maintenance against her brother. Especially in South India, it is customary to announce during marriage ceremonies that she is moving from one gotra to another. If a woman wants, a will can create a will. The Supreme Court has objected to challenging the validity of a provision of the Hindu Succession Act. He has sent the property dispute between Peria and in -laws for mediation. In fact, in several petitions in the Supreme Court, the provision has been challenged to give the property to the husband’s family on the death of a childless Hindu widow without will. The Supreme Court has challenged the provision of the Hindu Succession Act, stating that after the death of the husband, the property of the childless widow will be given to the husband’s family. If no one is alive in the husband’s family, then in such a situation the property will be given to the husband’s family. Nagratna and Justice R.K. The Supreme Court headed by Mahadevan heard a PIL against the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (Section 15 (1) (B)). If it belongs to the disposal of family property, the court commented that it is possible that the wife’s husband, son or daughter are not alive. Then her daughter may have children. All these will be legal successors on primary grounds. The lawyer of the petitioner argued that everything goes to the husband’s family. If this court considers Section 15 (1) B as arbitrary, in which it is argued that it affects the dignity of the woman, the question arises that if she depends on her husband’s property, what will happen to her dignity? According to this section of the Act, if a childless woman dies without a will and has no successor in the first category, the second class people will be the successor of the property. The Vakil said that it is a kind of public interest litigation, as many such cases may come up. In one such case, the husband’s sister is claiming her property after the death of her childless brother and sister -in -law. The court has noticed that the deceased woman may have married again and went elsewhere. The controversy in the petition filed in the Supreme Court is that a young working couple died without a will during Kovid. Now there is a dispute between the woman’s mother and mother -in -law. The mother of the deceased youth claims that she has the right over all the property of the deceased couple. While the mother of the deceased woman wants her to get her daughter’s property. The Supreme Court will now hear the matter filed by advocate Sameer Sodhi in November.